CryptoCardia
CryptoCardia
[Transaction-Governed Security]
[ CryptoCardia Secure Runtime ]
[Execution-time security for transactions]

Transaction-Governed Security

:: vault_authorize(tx)

CryptoCardia enforces policy and risk controls at the moment a transaction is attempted — with independent Vault authorization that remains reliable even if keys, apps, or endpoints are compromised.

[ Not a wallet company. A control plane. ]
Execution-time governance (TGS)Client / Wallet / Appcreates intentPolicy Enginerules + constraintsRisk Scoringdeterministic + anomalyIndependent Vaultauthorizes / deniesRailscrypto / card / bank
Policy DSLDeterministic riskAnomaly detectionIndependent authorizationMulti-rail ready
[Threat model]

Assume the client is compromised.

Traditional security assumes the signing environment is trustworthy. CryptoCardia assumes the opposite. Transactions must pass governance and risk checks, then receive approval from an independent Vault.

The outcome: fewer catastrophic drains, clearer controls, and auditability at the point of execution.

[What we enforce]

Rules that execute, not just alerts.

  • • Spending limits, allowlists/denylists, velocity controls, time windows.
  • • Context-aware policy (device, geo, session, asset, destination, rail).
  • • Risk scoring with deterministic signals + anomaly detection to flag outliers.
  • • Vault-enforced authorization: approve / deny / step-up verification.
[Who this is for]

Teams shipping rails, wallets, or financial workflows.

If your product moves, routes, or influences value — across crypto, cards, or bank rails — you need execution-time governance that remains enforceable even when the app layer is compromised.

Pilot conversations

Let’s test TGS against your real threat model.

We’re looking for design partners who want stronger controls at execution time: policy enforcement, risk scoring, and independent authorization.

We keep this tight: 30–45 minutes, your current flow, and a concrete pilot scope.